ftwsmiley1 copy.gif (18440 bytes)

This Day in My History


If winning isn't everything, why do they keep score?

~ Vince Lombardi

Yesterday's Entries

2000: Cyber Watch
 Just Peachy
2002:  California Fried Journal Entry
2003:  Slavish Loyalty


Strange Life of Ivan Osokin
by P.D. Ouspensky


The Olympics

Buy my stuff at Lulu!



tug-o-war2.jpg (24794 bytes)

If canine tug-of-war were an Olympic event, I'd win!

Sheila Video 1 ("See Sheila Run")
Sheila Video 2 ("Meet Barkley")
Sheila Video 3 ("Play time")



17 August 2004

I fell asleep watching the Olympics and woke up feeling sore.

How odd, I thought. Why should I be feeling sore?

Then I remembered that we’d gone to the gym and I’d done about 25 minutes on the treadmill (I usually do 15) and 10 on the exercise bike (I discovered if I put the seat up high enough and stretch my bad leg out every few minutes, I can pedal without too much discomfort), plus the usual stretching exercises. Guess my body was saying "you should do this more often and it wouldn’t hurt so much."

What kept me on the treadmill for so long was being engrossed in the men’s volleyball game between the USA and Australia.

I’m having a difficult time with the Olympics this year. We are getting more coverage by far than four years ago, when Peggy was so frustrated at only having a few hours each night of highlights. Now we are getting 24 hour a day coverage, perhaps not live, but almost live. So I’m seeing a lot more than I have in the past--and also more interested than in the past.

But my problem is that I’m an American and should be cheering the home team on. However, after my six weeks in Australia, immersed in Australian sports, I find I have divided loyalties. I was, thus, disappointed when the American team squeaked out a win over the Aussies in beach volleyball. But it was a close game, so win or lose (whoever won or lost!) it was a good game.

Easier was the USA women’s win over China...easier to find the team to support, and nice that it was a clear cut victory.

More difficult is knowing whether I’m cheering for the Australian Ian Thorpe or our own Michael Phelps. Whoever take the gold, it’s going to be an exciting competition.

(I’m also having problems with terminology. In previous years I would be "rooting" for my favorites, but learning that "root" means something entirely different in Australia makes it difficult to use that term. I’m looking for a suitable alternative!)

There was some guilt when Peggy was here in the States watching the Sydney Olympics. She found it difficult dealing with the American coverage and the emphasis on American athletes to the exclusion of all others. It was, then, with some relief that I read the following in Anna’s journal yesterday (Anna’s husband is an American living with his Australian wife in Sydney):

I think Rob is feeling a little left out of the sporting frenzy (notwithstanding he’s as big a Wallabies fan as anyone I know). Australian coverage of the Games is particularly one-eyed and one-sided, and I have to admit that I’m not especially fair-minded when it comes to reportage. For a split second there, Australia was leading the medals count, and I called this out gleefully to the kitchen. "How about the US?" he asked. "Ummm …. " I scrolled down the page. "Don’t know".

"But we’re WINNING!" I said, just so he got the point. "Yes, but you always do on the first day. Swimming. It’s all downhill from there".

I have some problem with media coverage of these events.  These athletes are the cream of the crop.  They have reached the pinnacle.  They are performing in the Olympics, for Pete's sake, and if they are a fraction of a second off the lead and take the silver medal, some of the reporters act as if it was the worst tragedy, a terrible disgrace, a terrible disappointment.  As if being the second best athlete in the world is something to be ashamed of (in some contests, when the American takes second, you don't even HEAR who took the bronze--the bronze isn't even worth mentioning!)

I do love the athletes, though, who take the wins and losses in stride and try to downplay the "terrible tragedy" of coming in 0.1 second behind the gold medal winner.  Every single athlete I've seen interviewed has been very philosophic about this just being another contest and how s/he wasn't at his/her best and that tomorrow is another day. 

But I guess without that heightened sense of the thrill of victory and the agony of defeat broadcasters have nothing to talk about, and we all know that broadcasters have to talk about something.

For me, just showing up and completing 25 minutes on a treadmill is victory enough.   I don't care if the person next to me is running and has been running for an hour.   I go for a personal best and accept the pain as part of the gain.

Recommended Web site

This from my friend Michael:  The CDC is quietly going about the task of revising the content of its guidelines concerning HIV/AIDS. Among other dangerous and misguided points, they propose dropping language concerning condoms and safe sex and inserting language promoting abstaining from sex before marriage as the approved method of teaching AIDS prevention.

The proposed amendments include language that would return the US to the dark days of the early 1980's when the word AIDS was not spoken and people were dropping dead because the Reagan and Bush administrations in Washington couldn't see beyond a narrow moral agenda to address an exploding health crisis.

Today (August 16) is the last day to post feedback directly to the CDC on their website. If you wish to review the proposed amendments to the CDC guidelines and post your own response, their website is www.cdc.gov


Butterfly.jpg (64706 bytes)

Another of my altered book pages--
Getting ready for the gathering next weekend!


Powered by SignMyGuestbook.com



<--previous | next-->

Journal home | bio | cast | archive | links | awards | Fotolog | Bev's Home Page



Search WWW Search Funny the World

Created 7/27/04 setstats 1  

setstats 1